Re: holding back the tide
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:02:53PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Adam Heath, please consider helping the gcc maintainer do some DBS surgery,
> > > because it is DBS that is keeping gcc from building.
> >
> > Branden, do some fucking research next time, before you place blame. Bug
> > 80843 even proves it doesn't use dbs, or are you so dense as to not know what
> > a dpatch file is?
>
> Bdale told me it was using DBS, or pasted some output that looked like DBS
> to me. Also I thought I remembered you boasting months ago that DBS was
> used in our XFree86, glibc, and gcc packages.
Bdale hates dbs, doesn't know what it is, so I don't trust his assement of the
issue. I never said glibc nor gcc use dbs. They use a system like dbs, one I
feel is incorrect(each .dpatch system includes code to apply the patch, which,
I feel, is code duplication).
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-----END PGP INFO-----
Reply to: