Re: Release Goals for Woody? The trouble with "zen".
> are shooting for. I'd like to say "Debian Jr. version 1 *must* contain A,
> B and C, *should* contain X, Y and Z, and *may* contain Q, R and S." But
> since Debian Jr. version one-point-oh's release is very much tied to
> Woody's "zen" release, any such statement would be made on faith alone.
Oooh, sounds like the RFCs. Now, for true RFC-dom, you have to write it
like:
"And <name> said let there be <protocol>! And let it use commands such as
<1>, <2> and <3>! And there was <protocol>."
d
Reply to: