[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

/bin/sh and glibc2.2


 I wonder, if shells that are suitable for /bin/sh should
 predepend on the new libc6.
 I faced this problem when I updated ash to get rid of some
 bugs. ash did not configure because of the 2.1.94 dependency,
 but was broken because of the missing GLIBC2.2 symbol (or so).
 Hence, all /bin/sh scripts would not run now (until I changed
 the link to bash).

 Should this filed as a `critical' bug? What other packages
 could be involved (perl?, ...)


Reply to: