Hi, I wonder, if shells that are suitable for /bin/sh should predepend on the new libc6. I faced this problem when I updated ash to get rid of some bugs. ash did not configure because of the 2.1.94 dependency, but was broken because of the missing GLIBC2.2 symbol (or so). Hence, all /bin/sh scripts would not run now (until I changed the link to bash). Should this filed as a `critical' bug? What other packages could be involved (perl?, ...) Ulf