Re: /bin/sh and glibc2.2

To: Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler <ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: debian devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: /bin/sh and glibc2.2
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:31:31 +1100
Message-id: <20001015073131.A16705@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: <10010091136.AA27926@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>; from ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de on Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:36:19PM +0200
References: <10010091136.AA27926@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
> 
>  I wonder, if shells that are suitable for /bin/sh should
>  predepend on the new libc6.

Well since no one else has replied to this message, I'll presume that
there are no objections to the predependency and add it.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /bin/sh and glibc2.2
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- /bin/sh and glibc2.2
  - From: ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de (Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler)

Prev by Date: Re: ftp.fr.debian.org ?
Next by Date: Re: StarOffice now GPL?!
Previous by thread: /bin/sh and glibc2.2
Next by thread: Re: /bin/sh and glibc2.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread