Re: Bug#74171: recommends nonexistent package

[Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 08:38:39PM -0700, Brian F. Kimball wrote:
> > I think you miss the point of bug severity here! recommends missing
> > package does not break anything! If you were not on debian-devel last
> > week, there were discussion about Bug severity issue. Check current
> > debian weekly news for the pointer.
> 
> You're right, I inflated the severity.  Sorry about that.  I'll change
> it if you haven't already.
> 
> > BTW, how does xiterm perform for you?
> 
> I'm not a user of xiterm, just someone who got mightily frustrated after
> playing around with "apt-cache unmet".  Too many packages have unmet
> dependencies.  Some are legitimate and/or reasonable (like yours), some
> have existed for months and are ignored by their maintainers (which is
> excruciatingly annoying).

What's obnoxiously annoying is you filing a bunch of purely `maintonly'
class bugs to `submit' address, and using an address to which the BTS can't
deliver ACKs without a bounce message.

On behalf of owner@bugs and debian-bugs-dist readers, thanks for 100KB of
spam.

>:(

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification