Re: On Bugs
>>"peter" == peter karlsson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
peter> I did. To me, not making it possible to translate one of the
peter> central package handling utility of the operating system
peter> "makes the package unsuitable for a stable Debian release".
Umm. You have just made a point (perhaps not one you were
intending to make). It seems quite obvious to me that using a fully
subjective judgment call on what is unsuitable for a stable Debian
release is perhaps not one that most end users can make.
Admittedly, end users can't make the determination on whether
a package violates policy in a manner that justifies an important bug
I think we need to look further for a proper definiton of an
important bug that is useable by end users as well.
I think the policy violations may need a (hidden in report bg
et al) severity ``policy'' reserveed for RC policy violations, or
As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well
try making it round this time. Mike Dennison
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
- Re: On Bugs
- From: peter karlsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>