Re: On Bugs

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On Bugs
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: 06 Oct 2000 00:23:18 -0500
Message-id: <87lmw24k6x.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: tb@becket.net's message of "04 Oct 2000 22:37:20 -0700"
References: <20001003034733.B27483@azure.humbug.org.au> <XFMail.20001002105556.shaleh@valinux.com> <20001003041034.D27483@azure.humbug.org.au> <20001002193559.A23306@tardis.ed.ac.uk> <87n1gj26i7.fsf@becket.becket.net>

>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:

 Thomas> That's a great theory.  But I don't think it matches reality in
 Thomas> practice; I think some maintainers just ignore huge patches of normal
 Thomas> bugs.

	And what is the guarantee that if important bug repotrs gets
 more commmon, these maintainers shan't start ignoring those as well?

	manoj
-- 
 Do not underestimate the power of the Force.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

References:
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: Possibly quite a few bugs?
Next by Date: Re: On Bugs
Previous by thread: Re: On Bugs
Next by thread: Re: On Bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread