Re: On Bugs

To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On Bugs
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 04 Oct 2000 22:37:20 -0700
Message-id: <87n1gj26i7.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: Mark Brown's message of "Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:35:59 +0100"
References: <20001003034733.B27483@azure.humbug.org.au> <XFMail.20001002105556.shaleh@valinux.com> <20001003041034.D27483@azure.humbug.org.au> <20001002193559.A23306@tardis.ed.ac.uk>

Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> writes:

> It often seems to be more a case of prioritising what gets fixed - it's
> not that the bug is not being taken seriously but rather that other bugs
> are being looked at first.

That's a great theory.  But I don't think it matches reality in
practice; I think some maintainers just ignore huge patches of normal
bugs.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

References:
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: On Bugs
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: On Bugs
Next by Date: Re: dynamically linking debian packages?
Previous by thread: Re: On Bugs
Next by thread: Re: On Bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread