[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IMAPD



On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 10:41:25PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Where do things stand in regard to making sure UW IMAPD
> doesn't remain in `main' if it isn't free?

If it looks like negotiations with UW are at a complete standstill, and
that they will threaten or sue anyone who distributes modified versions
without execution of a separate license, then someone needs to file a bug
against "ftp.debian.org" requesting the removal of the package (or its
migration to non-free, if it is still maintainable under such a
restriction).  Best to coordinate with the package maintainer on this.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |   "Why do we have to hide from the police,
Debian GNU/Linux                |   Daddy?"
branden@debian.org              |   "Because we use vi, son.  They use
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |   emacs."

Attachment: pgpMNUvtexo80.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: