Re: KDE2 - nice demolition job ...
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:05:26AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, erik wrote:
> [lots of stuff deleted -- basically a bitch about new maintainer]
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:57:41AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > Good point :-)
> Not really:
>  This point (if it really erik's point -- hard to tell) is
> not well expressed by erik's subject line, and was not well expressed
> in any of erik's original posts. Even the current post is way to
> verbose to be worth quoting.
>  New Maintainer is a tough job, with a lot of work to be done
> (especially because we weren't processing applications at all, last
> year, because things had gotten so out of hand and the people dealing
> with it had gotten so stressed out). In spite of that, NM is processing
> people at a fairly decent rate (and most of the people who haven't been
> processed haven't had their identities confirmed, yet).
> > Not to stir anything up, here, but, to the NM team, what exactly is "the
> > process" for dealing with NM applications?
> Please read: http://nm.debian.org
Oh well, at least nobody can say, "Well, nobody ever said anything ... ".
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org