[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP lame

Buddha Buck <bmbuck@14850.com> wrote:

> >I understand fully that using the name "non-US" for patent-encumbered
> >software is wrong. However, the machine pandora.debian.org is in an
> >excellent position to also host a "non-Software-Patents" section of the
> >archive, which can again be subdivided in main, contrib and non-free.
> If we do that, I suggest that "non-Software-Patents" is a bad 
> name.  Perhaps "patented" is a better name.

Does it have to be tied to patent-problems?  What about a more general
section named (for example) "encumbered"?

It could then also be used for software with other sorts of local
problems -- like "indexed" games here in germany.


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: