Re: X and runlevels
> On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> wrote:
> > also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the
> > admin to define.
alfie@innocent.com (Gerfried Fuchs) wrote:
> Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that
> defines what at least runlevel 2 and 3 are for. I would really
> like to see that Debian complies with the FHS in that case, when it
> complies to it in the other meanings also, quite strict, even.
Not quite. The FHS briefly mentions *System V's* runlevel 2 and 3
(along with Berkley's multiuser state). It does not specify anything
about runlevels for Linux or any other OS.
- Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: