[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X and runlevels

On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> wrote:
> also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the
> admin to define.

 Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that defines
what at least runlevel 2 and 3 are for.  I would really like to see that
Debian complies with the FHS in that case, when it complies to it in the
other meanings also, quite strict, even.

 Just a thought...
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday

Attachment: pgpnbddGbLiwC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: