Re: RFC: moving packages to project/orphaned
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Regarding the severity of the ftp.debian.org bug: important.
> Rationale: in the general case, packages that managed to get to this
> state are non-interesting (otherwise they would have been adopted
> already). That means it's a non maintained package which noone cares
non-interesting doesn't mean uncared about. Frequently it includes sweet
little tools that need only an occasional updating for policy changes.
No real bugs to speak of.
> about, which in turn means bugreports won't get answered to. IMO,
> they *should* be removed before release. Counter-arguments for the
> general case are welcomed.
>
> display-dhammapada (68091), 33 days old
As for this little tool, I have a release in ftp://dvdeug.dhis.org
that would update it to the latest policy and close the only bug
on it, if any one wants to upload it, or sponsor me (I am in
new-maintainers now.)
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, "Rock and Roll Children"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: