Re: RFC: moving packages to project/orphaned
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Regarding the severity of the ftp.debian.org bug: important.
> Rationale: in the general case, packages that managed to get to this
> state are non-interesting (otherwise they would have been adopted
> already). That means it's a non maintained package which noone cares
non-interesting doesn't mean uncared about. Frequently it includes sweet
little tools that need only an occasional updating for policy changes.
No real bugs to speak of.
> about, which in turn means bugreports won't get answered to. IMO,
> they *should* be removed before release. Counter-arguments for the
> general case are welcomed.
> display-dhammapada (68091), 33 days old
As for this little tool, I have a release in ftp://dvdeug.dhis.org
that would update it to the latest policy and close the only bug
on it, if any one wants to upload it, or sponsor me (I am in
David Starner - firstname.lastname@example.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, "Rock and Roll Children"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org