Re: RFC/ITP: everybuddy-cvs
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:24:55PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> People using unofficial packages should be aware about the
> dificulties. So I wouldn't mention the unofficial packages in control
> files for official Debian packages.
OK. I'll mention it on the website for the unofficial ones.
> I also don't like the idea of having special packages for cvs-versions
> of software. It is cruft.
In this case, the CVS version is usually pretty far ahead of released, and
is just as stable. Do you think I should switch the main package to using
CVS code? Or just continue to do my unofficial CVS packages and have the
official ones be the released version? I know the EB authors would prefer
that we not switch to CVS code, so I think that's a bad idea...but on the
other hand, the CVS code would be a "better" package for some debian
michael d. ivey [McQ] : "It is a miracle that curiosity survives
<firstname.lastname@example.org> : formal education."
http://gweezlebur.com/~ivey/ : -- Albert Einstein
encrypted email preferred :
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org