Re: APT problem

To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Cc: meskes@debian.org
Subject: Re: APT problem
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:40:11 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000831164011.G1402@feivel.credativ.de>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, meskes@debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000830215738.C5263@cistron.nl>; from wichert@cistron.nl on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:57:38PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 20000830154927.A18756@feivel.credativ.de> <[🔎] 20000830215738.C5263@cistron.nl>

On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:57:38PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> It means the libc6 package you have installed has a different md5sum then
> the package it finds on ftp.corel.com, and assumes that the version on
> ftp.corel.com is a newer recompile. Strange logic, but that is how

Which of course is correct. Not only the md5sum is different but also the
filesize. Wonder what they did with the source.

Thanks.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APT problem
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@murphy.nl>

References:
- APT problem
  - From: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
- Re: APT problem
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Security of Debian SuX0r?
Next by Date: Re: APT problem
Previous by thread: Re: APT problem
Next by thread: Re: APT problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread