Previously Richard Braakman wrote: > I don't know how the decision ended up being made, but the argument > I presented at the time is that a dependency on debhelper is far more > likely to be versioned than the others are. A package that makes use > of a new feature of debhelper is going to have to declare its own > build-depends anyway. <aol>Very much agreed, excellent point</aol> Wichert (who has grown very tired of debhelper changes making building security fixes a painful job at times) -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpB60kv0c__v.pgp
Description: PGP signature