Re: Intent To Split: netbase

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Intent To Split: netbase
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 17:58:06 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000814175806.A3131@dman.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87k8djejjq.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>; from srivasta@debian.org on Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:20:41PM -0500
References: <[🔎] 200008102352.e7ANqKO17313@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] sa7hf8racwg.fsf@indy.progenylinux.com> <[🔎] 20000812094149.A1015@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] sa73dk7rbx7.fsf@indy.progenylinux.com> <[🔎] 87k8djejjq.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>

> 	No real reason? Only one package can listen in on port 25, and

Only one package can listen on port 25 of one IP.  It is possible to
have multiple packages listening on different ports or different IPs.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: Jacob Kuntz <jpk@cape.com>

References:
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>
- Re: Intent To Split: netbase
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Seems potato's now 'stable'! 2.2's out, then?
Next by Date: Re: ITP: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers
Previous by thread: Re: Intent To Split: netbase
Next by thread: Re: Intent To Split: netbase
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread