Re: Bug#68661: Should not remove pager's alternative on upgrade
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 11:15:08PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> At Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:42:36 +0200,
> Robert Luberda <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > To conclude:
> > 1) Packages should not to remove alternative when upgrading - and this
> > is bug in less, w3m, lv and probably other packages.
> Hmm, is this bug is considered as release critical?
1024D/B0FA4F49: FA38 2D7E 408F 61E4 BF49 B48F 04BD F5BE B0FA 4F49
2048g/C631AF6E: B89D 7BF4 AA6B 569B D9D1 4BF6 3459 66AB C631 AF6E