Re:Re: General Resolution: Removing non-freeeral Resolution: Removing non-free
>Gilbert Laycock <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> The Sun Community Source License (SCSL) under which jdk1.2, and (I
>> think) the Java 2 specification, are released state that an attempt to
>> produce your own implementation of the specification is a "derived
>> work" and therefore also covered by the SCSL.
>Leaving aside the jdk, and speaking only for one who has not seen it:
>it is my understanding that Sun can claim whatever they like, but in
>fact, an implementation of a standard is not a derived work.
(League for) Programming Freedom. 8)