>>>>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:21:27 -0500, David Starner <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
David> You seem to deny that this is a major change, which apparenly
David> means you haven't been reading anything the other people
David> say. I find your position reprehesible - instead of leading by
David> example and removing your non-free packages from distribution
David> and trying to convince others to do the same, you would try
David> changing the rules to get your way. You then deny that your
David> change would have consequences and use double-talk - "it is no
David> more than miscellany", 'non-free packages could still use the
David> BTS' (paraphrase) - to convince people.
This is uncalled for. Attacking someone and calling them dishonest is
not a good way to make anyone else actually listen to your arguments.
I certainly won't read any more of your posts.
@James LewisMoss <email@example.com | Blessed Be!
@ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach