[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Clarifications

>>>>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:21:27 -0500, David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> said:

 David> You seem to deny that this is a major change, which apparenly
 David> means you haven't been reading anything the other people
 David> say. I find your position reprehesible - instead of leading by
 David> example and removing your non-free packages from distribution
 David> and trying to convince others to do the same, you would try
 David> changing the rules to get your way. You then deny that your
 David> change would have consequences and use double-talk - "it is no
 David> more than miscellany", 'non-free packages could still use the
 David> BTS' (paraphrase) - to convince people.

This is uncalled for.  Attacking someone and calling them dishonest is
not a good way to make anyone else actually listen to your arguments.
I certainly won't read any more of your posts.


@James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org       |  Blessed Be!
@    http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com |  Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

Reply to: