[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Clarifications

On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 01:49:39AM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:21:27 -0500, David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> said:
>  David> You seem to deny that this is a major change, which apparenly
>  David> means you haven't been reading anything the other people
>  David> say. I find your position reprehesible - instead of leading by
>  David> example and removing your non-free packages from distribution
>  David> and trying to convince others to do the same, you would try
>  David> changing the rules to get your way. You then deny that your
>  David> change would have consequences and use double-talk - "it is no
>  David> more than miscellany", 'non-free packages could still use the
>  David> BTS' (paraphrase) - to convince people.
> This is uncalled for.  Attacking someone and calling them dishonest is
> not a good way to make anyone else actually listen to your arguments.
> I certainly won't read any more of your posts.

Very nice.  When someone disagrees with you in real life, do you just put your
fingers in your ears and yell "lalalalalalala"?


Reply to: