On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 01:49:39AM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:21:27 -0500, David Starner <email@example.com> said:
> David> You seem to deny that this is a major change, which apparenly
> David> means you haven't been reading anything the other people
> David> say. I find your position reprehesible - instead of leading by
> David> example and removing your non-free packages from distribution
> David> and trying to convince others to do the same, you would try
> David> changing the rules to get your way. You then deny that your
> David> change would have consequences and use double-talk - "it is no
> David> more than miscellany", 'non-free packages could still use the
> David> BTS' (paraphrase) - to convince people.
> This is uncalled for. Attacking someone and calling them dishonest is
> not a good way to make anyone else actually listen to your arguments.
> I certainly won't read any more of your posts.
Very nice. When someone disagrees with you in real life, do you just put your
fingers in your ears and yell "lalalalalalala"?