[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vrms on non-free

On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:57:23PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> its actually not a problem in vrms, but rather that the status file
> does not tend to get things like section updated properly.  i guess
> this would be a bug in dselect or apt? or dpkg?

apt-get does not normally update dpkg's available file, presumably for 
efficiency reasons or something.  Does vrms look in the status file or
in the available file?

Richard Braakman

Reply to: