On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:57:23PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > its actually not a problem in vrms, but rather that the status file > > does not tend to get things like section updated properly. i guess > > this would be a bug in dselect or apt? or dpkg? > > apt-get does not normally update dpkg's available file, presumably for > efficiency reasons or something. Does vrms look in the status file or > in the available file? the status file, dselect update did not fix the descrepencies for me, i think i just edited status myself to fix it... -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgph3SeW2FECF.pgp
Description: PGP signature