Re: Why the GR is not necessary
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:21:39AM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
> Please don't take this as a compromise, because I'm not compromising.
> I'm suggesting we do this in -addition- to the GR.
> (remember my position: I do not agree to any reference to non-free in
> the social contract. none at all.)
you are at complete liberty to hold whatever stupid and/or insane position
don't expect anyone else to agree with you. most people will just think
you're a fucking nutcase...not their fault, really, if you go around
representing yourself as one.