** On Jun 08, Jeff Licquia scribbled: > And, technically, they're right. Sure, we exclude it from our CDs, > but our default sources.list has non-free right there. What is the > difference between, say, "apt-get install mozilla" and "apt-get > install netscape" to our users? Do they understand that there is a > difference? First of all, for most *users* Netscape is as free as Mozilla - they don't pay a quid for neither, so? You wan't to politically educate the users, teach them about the nuances of GPL/LGPL/Artistic/BSD and other licenses? If so, fine - go ahead, but I'm afraid that software distribution isn't the right media for such kind of education. marek
Attachment:
pgpDcTwibx5Ay.pgp
Description: PGP signature