Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
From: Matthew Vernon <mcv21@cam.ac.uk>
Date: 08 Jun 2000 11:56:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5bpupscugi.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: Branden Robinson's message of Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:32:01 GMT
References: <[🔎] 87d7lu2n9d.fsf@complete.org> <[🔎] 20000606222427.A7247@damaged.kinnee.net> <[🔎] 874s762m67.fsf@complete.org> <[🔎] 20000606224512.C7247@damaged.kinnee.net> <[🔎] 20000607152735.B18417@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 20000607152735.B18417@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 20000607033700.A17882@ecn.purdue.edu>

Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu> writes:

> That's almost exactly what this proposal aims to do.  As it stands we pay a
> contribute a significant portion of our resources to the upkeep of non-free
> software.

Unsupported assertion. Kindly prove it - non-free is certainly a small
section of the archive, for example...

Matthew

-- 
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: Erick Kinnee <erick@kinnee.net>
- Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: Erick Kinnee <erick@kinnee.net>
- Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Next by Date: Re: vrms on non-free
Previous by thread: Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Next by thread: Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread