[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Opposed Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)

[ Continued on -project ]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:35:48PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Yes. The social contract is sacred in that it is one of the building
> blocks upon which the project is founded. Any changes to these foundations
> will lead to project splits and worse. See the flamewar this has already
> caused.

I don't believe in projects that don't allow their basic text to be
updated.  Such projects will eventually become relics of no practical

Even the Constitutions of sovereign states can be changed and modernized,
and it can even be done peacefully.  See for example Finland :-)

> Found another project if you need to be so exclusive....

Found another project if you can't live with changes :-)

%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

Reply to: