Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free, Draft 2
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Branden> No one is saying that we should make non-free software hard
Branden> to use. Even if the GR was passed there is no reason to
Branden> believe that, after a transitional period, it would be any
Branden> harder to retrieve and install the same non-free software
Branden> packages that currently exist. Of course, some volunteer
Branden> effort is going to be necessary to realize this state of
Branden> affairs. But that is true of almost everything Debian
Branden> developers do.
No reason to believe. Sponsors shall magically appear for
hardware and bnadwidth to host non-free software. Soem one shall set
up the BTS. run dinstall. create upload queues. And non of this
shall, some how, impact the tiem spent on Debian propoer.
Your threshold of belief is set very low.
"The picture's pretty bleak, gentlemen... The world's climates are
changing, the mammals are taking over, and we all have a brain about
the size of a walnut." some dinosaurs from The Far Side, by Gary
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C