On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental (i > did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable). If I happen to get such a thing done soon, I may do so. > Debian 2.2 user are using potato, which comes with 3.3.6-whatever and should > work ok. 7 release critical bugs, 2 denial-of-service attacks, and a tempfile race would disagree with you. Fixes for these have been uploaded to auric's incoming as of a few minutes go. > What's the problem here ? > > (apart from you having not a lot of time which is undertandable) Repeat the above parenthesized words until you fully believe them. > Also you tell you will be repackaging X from a clean start, care to explain a > bit what you have planned to do, and how we can help in this process ? Writing all this up takes time, too. I've already written one mail along these lines and my packaging plans per se have not changed drastically. -- G. Branden Robinson | I am sorry, but what you have mistaken Debian GNU/Linux | for malicious intent is nothing more branden@ecn.purdue.edu | than sheer incompetence! roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- J. L. Rizzo II
Attachment:
pgplRfpqfNLDc.pgp
Description: PGP signature