Re: ITP: sn, amiwm, flashplayer
Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu> writes:
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:27:30AM +0200, Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer wrote:
> > Package: sn
>
> Great, but can I please suggest a longer package name (and binary name if
> applicable)? The two-character namespace is too crowded.
Hmm. There's no binary named sn in the package, so the only
problem could be the package name. I don't know any other
package by the name "sn" (neither in debian nor elsewhere), but I
could name it snntpd after NNTP server binary.
I'd like to stick to sn because that's the "official" package
name, and it doesn't clash with anything.
Opinions of anyone else?
-- forcer
--
((email . "forcer@mindless.com") (www . "http://forcix.cx/")
(irc . "forcer@#StarWars (IRCnet)") (gpg . "/other/forcer.gpg"))
Reply to: