Re: On IRC logs, expectation of privacy, and posting
Mike Bilow wrote:
> This makes good sense, but I suggest that it might be wise to adopt a
> convention of naming the channel where a logged discussion is to take
> place something like "#foo-logged" so that no one will claim surprise.
> In practice, since people will join and leave during the course of any
> discussion, it will be impossible to solicit consent from each.
In practice, it's often impossible to know beforehand that discussion is
going to be worth posting.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: