Re: The lilo problem

To: David Butts <dbutts@genuity.com>
Cc: Mike Bilow <mikebw@colossus.bilow.com>, Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, vincent@debian.org
Subject: Re: The lilo problem
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 23:32:33 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 3927E571.22089929@cupid.suninternet.com>
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.04.10005210254080.7159-100000@edsel.bbn.com>

David Butts wrote:

> Out of curiosity, how long has it been since a full kernel fit in 512Kb?

I guess I may be an exception here, but my kernels are on average 
around 460 Kb. What really annoyed me about the new lilo version
was that it refused to install even this zImage. Made me wonder
how small the new lilo wants its zImages to be before it'll work...

I just downgraded to the previous version of lilo and everything
worked fine again :)
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The lilo problem
  - From: Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com>
- Re: The lilo problem
  - From: Mike Bilow <mikebw@colossus.bilow.com>

References:
- Re: The lilo problem
  - From: David Butts <dbutts@genuity.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Potato not frozen but petrified ?
Next by Date: New lilo package in Incoming/
Previous by thread: Re: The lilo problem
Next by thread: Re: The lilo problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread