Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement

To: Paul Serice <serice@bigfoot.com>
Cc: debian-devel Mailing List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
From: Decklin Foster <fosterd@hartwick.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:53:12 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000516115312.A24273@photek.dhs.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3920EE5E.A4F2111D@bigfoot.com>; from serice@bigfoot.com on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 01:44:46AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 3920EE5E.A4F2111D@bigfoot.com>

[Why do I even bother? there are 25 messages in this thread already.
Stop feeding trolls, people...]

Paul Serice writes:

> Unless you are one of the Debian anarchists, I think it will be
> eye-opening to see just how little Stallman respects the rights of
> others.  I know it was for me.

<snip>

I think you have the wrong room. debian-project is down the hall.
gnu.misc.discuss and Slashdot are not in this *building*. Shoo.

-- 
There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There
are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)

Reply to:

References:
- Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
  - From: Paul Serice <serice@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Is there a backport for the framebuffer device?
Next by Date: Re: intent to package emu_2.34
Previous by thread: Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
Next by thread: This is what you should be criticizing (Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread