Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.

To: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:34:47 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000515213447.A7583@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200005160427.VAA03394@earth.laney.edu>; from jim@laney.edu on Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:27:22PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 20000515202152.C1899@silk.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 200005160427.VAA03394@earth.laney.edu>

Jim Lynch wrote:
> Joey,
> 
> I couldn't seem to get info on the testing at the time... but indeed, the
> debian-testing list is open and unmoderated. So I stand corrected on that 
> point. Was it always open?

Yes, AFAIK. A closed testing list sort of defeats the point.

-- 
see shy jo

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Next by Date: Potato stats
Previous by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Next by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread