Re: Archive is moving to auric / Incoming disabled
Previously Craig Sanders wrote:
> btw, reiserfs would probably take a lot less than 4-5 minutes to
> do the ls-lR - it's amazing how fast it is for operations that are
> traditionally slow on ext2 and other fs. i'm using it for squid cache
> spools and for an experimental news spool - no problems so far. it'll be
> a good thing when reiserfs is included in the standard kernel.
It's also amazing that reiserfsck is still useless and the 2.3.x
version of it still doesn't grok the 2.2.x diskformat. I really
don't think we should use it for our archive.
That just in case someone was going to suggest that :)
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |