Re: potato late, goals for woody (IMHO)
Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > More new stuff almost certainly means more new bugs, doesn't it?
> Although the `old' packages accumulate enough bugs already...
Should we stop accepting new packages to woody <eg>?
> > This comparison is seriously flawed. Debian is comprised of a
> > truckload more than just base+Xserver, which would be more like what a
> > naked Windows offers.
> And therefore Debian would need by a magnitude more time to release than
> Windows, eh? :)
No, but it shows that we're not doing soo bad on that herculean task
we have before us. Perhaps we should consider going this way and
not releasing all thousands of packages at once.