Re: potato late, goals for woody (IMHO)
> > > Why better QM?
> > 1 year cycle: 1000 or all packages must be checked
> > 3-4 months : 100 (+/-) must be checked
> One year is three or four, 4/3 month cycles, which makes 300/400 packages
> changed, not 1000, unless part of your thesis is that this'll slow down
> Debian's development by a factor of two or three.
Hey, go ahead and build a better model which fixes all our problems. I'll
follow you then, if not then let us try this short release cycle. The current
one is not a good one anymore.