Re: potato late, goals for woody (IMHO)

[Hartmut Koptein <koptein@naffel.de>]

> > > Why better QM?
> >  1 year cycle: 1000 or all packages must be checked
> >  3-4 months  :  100 (+/-) must be checked
> 
> One year is three or four, 4/3 month cycles, which makes 300/400 packages
> changed, not 1000, unless part of your thesis is that this'll slow down
> Debian's development by a factor of two or three.

Hey, go ahead and build a better model which fixes all our problems. I'll
follow you then, if not then let us try this short release cycle. The current
one is not a good one anymore. 

MfG,


   Hartmut