Re: What about a non-free compiler? (Re: new port: debian-win32. when ?)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What about a non-free compiler? (Re: new port: debian-win32. when ?)
- From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
- Date: 01 May 2000 22:06:20 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87aeiaxcg3.fsf@hoss.orcus.priv.at>
- In-reply-to: Eray Ozkural's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2000 21:29:07 +0300"
- References: <38E1B6DD.F04C43EE@borco-ei.eng.hokudai.ac.jp> <20000329092043.B1039@polya> <14602.61605.331295.84742@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <390B07DF.9B80533C@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <E12lax9-0000UR-00@riva.ucam.org> <390B29F3.2624ABE7@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Eray Ozkural <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> writes:
> > Of course, nobody's stopping you trying out non-free, non-distributable
> > compilers for yourself, but let's not start using them to build
> > distributed Debian packages.
>
> I wonder if it would make any performance difference;
> then such packages would be very valuable for a high performance
> computing application.
Why don't you put work into a framework that lets one easily install
*and* update Debian packages from source. E.g.
apt-get --source upgrade
would fetch new source-packages for anything needing an upgrade,
build, and install them.
This way you can arrange for this super-compiler to be default on your
system, all your stuff will be ultra-optimized. This will benefit all
people with super-compilers, plus the mundanes which just want
everything done with "gcc -march=pentiumpro -O9".
--
Robbe
Reply to: