Re: Release-critical Bugreport for April 28, 2000
On 00-04-30 Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 10:38:54AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > For potato, only the recompilation of the package with libreadline4
> > instead of libreadlineg2 is needed and such a recompilation will be
> > definitely accept by our release-manager. I'm not sure, if he will
> I don't think this is correct. We have libreadlineg2 in potato so
> this is unneeded - as is the recompilation of apcalc.
Are you aware of the fact that libreadlineg2 is in the section oldlibs
while libreadline4 is in the section base? So the recompilation is
needed also for potato to make sure, that the packages don't use a
library from the section oldlib.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Reply to: