Re: Release-critical Bugreport for April 28, 2000
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:57:22PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 02:11:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > "grave" does, actually.
> >
> > If a bug makes a package fail only in a few corner cases, then it's
> > not release-critical (unless the damage is really bad).
>
> Agreed. However, generally we consider release critical to mean
> important, grave and critical bugs, but important bugs are often
> not really release critical. A definition problem.
Problem is that, unknowingly, there are a lot of "normal" bugs which
should be RC :(
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: