Re: Release-critical Bugreport for April 28, 2000
BugScan reporter <bugscan@debian.org> writes:
> Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 1
Whats happening with removing packages these days? Isn't it a long
time since something has happend there (or am I following the wrong
lists?)
Ok, I'm cynical...
> Package: acroread (debian/non-free)
> Package: glimpse (debian/non-free)
> Package: jdk1.1 (debian/non-free)
> Package: jdk1.1-dev (debian/non-free)
> Package: ssh-nonfree (non-US/non-free)
> Package: qmail (debian/non-free)
Non-free mark it [REMOVE]
> Package: aolserver-postgres (debian/main)
AOLish, mark it [REMOVE]
> Package: apcalc (debian/main)
> Package: arla (non-US/main)
> Package: balsa (debian/main)
> Package: blacs-lam-test (debian/main)
> Package: boa (debian/main)
> Package: gap4-doc-html (debian/non-free)
> Package: gnome-think (debian/main)
> Package: lam2 (debian/main)
> Package: zope (debian/main)
> Package: xpvm (debian/main)
> Package: scalapack (debian/main)
> Package: rplay-client (debian/main)
> Package: qvwm (debian/main)
> Package: mesag-widgets-dev (debian/main)
> Package: netatalk (debian/main)
> Package: octave (debian/main)
> Package: sced (debian/main)
> Package: gnomeicu (debian/main)
Don't know what it is - Can't be important - mark it [REMOVE]
> Package: cdrecord (debian/main)
Havn't we others cd-burners?
> Package: clisp (debian/main)
Lisp is a ugly language. Use scheme or SML instead.
> Package: ibcs2.0.35 (debian/main)
Ok, this is for old kernels. No matter what we can't support
it.
> Package: kernel-image-2.2.13-powerpc (debian/main)
I don't know what the kernel-status is. But a general clean up would
be nice. Do we need to ship with 4 or 5 2.2.X kernel-sources?
Flame away. We won't ever release if we're not being cynical about
critical bugs.
--
Peter er ikke sur, han er sær -- og han er ikke DIKUs sureste koder,
men måske nok DIKUs særeste ;)
- citat Pink
Reply to: