[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wrong priorities in the override file for potato

On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:

> > The result (for the i386 architecture) is here:
> > 
> > http://master.debian.org/~sanvila/potato
> Anything that deps on libncurses4 should be recompiled against libncurses5.

Should I take this in the sense that a standard or higher package which
depends on libncurses4 deserves an important bug to be recompiled?

> As for libdb2, isn't that a moot point considering it doesn't really exist,
> [...]

If it does not really exist, I think there should not be dependencies on it.
OTOH, if we are in the middle of a transition and the (real) 
dependencies are satisfied by libc6, then libc6 should have a 
Provides: libdb2, so that these dependencies are already satisfied in 
the dpkg sense. Joel?

 "03fabb536a6da51787cca01796248e18" (a truly random sig)

Reply to: