Re: Maintainer needed. and ITP: lyx-cjk
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 12:53:54PM +0900, Ryuichi Arafune wrote:
> >>>>> In <20000411220052.A2635@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>
> >>>>> David Starner <email@example.com> wrote:
> D.S.> Could you please upload a unpatched version of lyx first,
> D.S.> to undo the damage?
> Sorry, I wait to upload unpatched version until lyx-cjk is uploaded
> The reason.
> i) The non-cjk users have a way to avoid this problem to downgrade
> the version. (to use potato version)
> ii) However, cjk-users don't have any way to use lyx (except
> building by themselves) , if i upload unpatched lyx.
It will take a week or two for lyx-cjk to go through, leaving a
lyx that's completely broken for any user of straight lyx. Any one
upgrading from Potato will lose here. The status quo is that lyx
works and lyx-cjk doesn't exist. It's not acceptable to break
what currently works in order to provide new functionality.
David Starner - firstname.lastname@example.org
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU