[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New shmfs and Debian



Grendel wrote:

> > Anyway,  I have never thought of shared memory machines interfacing
> > through a filesystem. Sounds spooky.
> Why not? After all chunks of shared memory are allocated to intercommunicate
> between programs. Think of them as about some kind of two-way pipes. A
> program that requests shared memory, just opens a file which happens to be
> in the shared memory area. Another  process opens the same file and they can
> communicate at will. After that both ends close the file and the vm-area is
> deallocated. Besides, now by doing  'df' you see how much of shared memory
> is used :)) - I like that :))
> 
Okay, it's the UNIX way. Good ol' System V. Now I guess you know what I'm
about to ask: is it feasible performance-wise?

> > Hmmm, I guess that has nothing to do with multiprocessing? Or is it just
> > some facility for inter-process shared memory? Great, these guys re-invent
> SystemV IPC, that's it. See at the top of ipc/shm.c in the 2.3.99 tree.

I will check it. So no effort is made to get it to the cluster level, right?

-- 
 ++++-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---+----+----- ---  --  -  - 
 +  Eray "eXa" Ozkural                   .      .   .  . . .
 +  CS, Bilkent University, Ankara             ^  .  o   .      .
 |  mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr                .  ^  .   .


Reply to: