Re: RBL report..
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Alexander Koch wrote:
> > DUL is interesting. I changed my mind on that. I rather say
> > we use it since the amount of spam is certainly increasing
> > the last weeks and DUL is understandable.
> Yes there is more spam, but I've been looking and I haven't seen that much
> (if any at all) would be blocked by DUL.
I personally think the DUL is "most harmless" RBL and the "most
legitimate" (bad wording probably) for use. And if it only catches
on spam a week it is worth it, methinks.
I do not have the exact figures, unfortunately.