On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:37:38AM +0100, Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> 25.03.2000 pisze Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au):
> > [0] update-inetd needs a rewrite. It also needs to remain more or less
> > compatible. It also needs to end up being very tidy and flexible.
> > I'll end up working on this eventually, if no one else does, but if
> > someone else it first...
> Do you plan to implement a functionality similar to RH's chkconfig?
What's RH's chkconfig do?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpyfUIY5l59B.pgp
Description: PGP signature