Re: /usr/local again

To: Jacob Kuntz <jake@megabite.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /usr/local again
From: Chad Miller <cmiller@optilinkcomm.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:51:13 -0500
Message-id: <20000214135113.B12943@optilinkcomm.net>
In-reply-to: <20000214133357.B9568@megabite.net>
References: <00021222082502.27995@pounce> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002132119371.759-100000@riemann.nyongwa.montreal.qc.ca> <20000214111121.A11879@wormhole.galaxy> <20000214113524.A1784@megabite.net> <20000214183623.A13116@wormhole.galaxy> <20000214133357.B9568@megabite.net>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 01:33:57PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> we do have the authority to create packages that will optionally link to
> libraries there, use fonts from there, etc. read only however. do you see
> the distinction?

I'm not even sure about that.  Shouldn't we be completely ignorant of 
the local heiarchy?  It could be completely fscked up, and we shouldn't
care.
						- chad

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Bear Giles <bear@coyotesong.com>

References:
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Eric Weigel <ericw@bestnet.org>
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Steve Robbins <steve@nyongwa.montreal.qc.ca>
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net>
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Jacob Kuntz <jpk@cape.com>
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net>
- Re: /usr/local again
  - From: Jacob Kuntz <jake@megabite.net>

Prev by Date: Re: /usr/local again
Next by Date: Re: /usr/local again
Previous by thread: Re: /usr/local again
Next by thread: Re: /usr/local again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread