[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: INN packages



On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 08:37:43PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> They are not. Plain simply, uniover sucks under load and it's much
> slower than the traditonal overview database. INN 2.x is useful only
> on transit servers.

Or on servers with low reader load, or when it has a cache placed
between it and readers.  CNFS is enough of a win for some people to make
it worth dealing with the uniover performance problems.  This isn't to
say that it's a drop in replacement, but it is certainly worth looking
at.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
            http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS        http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/

Attachment: pgpikkHwP5C5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: