On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 08:37:43PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> They are not. Plain simply, uniover sucks under load and it's much
> slower than the traditonal overview database. INN 2.x is useful only
> on transit servers.
Or on servers with low reader load, or when it has a cache placed
between it and readers. CNFS is enough of a win for some people to make
it worth dealing with the uniover performance problems. This isn't to
say that it's a drop in replacement, but it is certainly worth looking
at.
--
Mark Brown mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
Attachment:
pgpikkHwP5C5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature