Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: FWD: C-Kermit & potato]
- To: Frank da Cruz <email@example.com>
- Cc: Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [email@example.com: Re: FWD: C-Kermit & potato]
- From: Vaidhyanathan Mayilrangam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:27:45 -0500
- Message-id: <20000105102745.B21778@loonys.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Frank da Cruz <email@example.com>, Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <CMM.firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 10:19:24AM -0500
- References: <CMM.firstname.lastname@example.org>
C-Kermit 7.0 will be a part of non-free and gkermit will be a part of main.
Hope that makes sense.
PS: For all of you Kermit "zealots" , gkermit and ckermit debs will be
available before end of today (I am in EST) at http://master.debian.org/~vaidhy
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 10:19:24AM -0500, Frank da Cruz wrote:
> Hi Debian people,
> Paul Flint, cc'd above, tells me you're having a problem with the C-Kermit
> 7.0 license? This is news to me, as the last (and only) word I had from
> anybody at Debian, Vaidhyanathan Mayilrangam <email@example.com>, was that
> everything was hunky-dory and C-Kermit 7.0 would be included in the next
> Debian release. That was our intention with the new license, and that's
> what I've been telling people. As you may know, the new license is OK with
> most other [GNU/]Linux and *BSD distributors, including FreeBSD, SuSE,
> Slackware, Mandrake, etc. Do we have a problem?
> The C-Kermit 7.0 release is at:
> and the new license is at:
> Take it, it's yours.
> - Frank